Verdict
Their clearest documented distinction is architectural emphasis. Silverfort markets inline runtime protection, Universal MFA, and an Authentication Firewall. 8Layers documents historical signal correlation, investigation timelines, causality graphs, and identity-control evidence.
8Layers response actions should not be described as equivalent to Silverfort's inline authentication enforcement.
Verified comparison
The table summarizes the public documentation reviewed. The sections below explain the scope and qualifications behind each entry.
What 8Layers publicly documents
8Layers connects Thor for ITDR, Octagon for ISPM, and Compass for identity-control compliance through a shared identity-data layer.
Documented response actions include block, session termination, token revocation, and credential scrambling. Specific actions available depend on the connected system and should be confirmed per integration.
What Silverfort publicly documents
Silverfort positions itself around runtime identity security. Its public pages describe inline protection, Universal MFA for legacy and custom systems, an Authentication Firewall, ITDR, ISPM, NHI security, and AI-agent security.
It also describes coverage spanning on-premises, OT, hybrid, cloud, and multicloud environments. Documented response actions include denial, MFA challenge, session termination, virtual fencing, and access quarantine.
Documented strengths and review limitations
8Layers
Documented strengths: Detection across the full attack lifecycle (persistence, privilege escalation, and lateral movement after login, not just at authentication) correlated across the full identity history, with investigation timelines, causality graphs, response actions, and compliance evidence.
Review limitations: Response is agentless and API-based rather than inline; enforcement on legacy or non-cloud systems should be validated. Actions may vary by integration.
Silverfort
Documented strengths: Inline runtime protection, Universal MFA, Authentication Firewall controls, and coverage for hybrid and legacy systems.
Review limitations: Protection sits inline in the authentication path, a model to weigh against agentless approaches. List pricing is not public and module availability can depend on environment.
Which product should you evaluate?
Consider 8Layers when you specifically need:
- ITDR and ISPM sharing an identity-data layer.
- Historical kill-chain correlation, timelines, and causality graphs.
- Continuous identity-control evidence for ENS, NIS2, ISO 27001, or SOC 2.
Consider Silverfort when you specifically need:
- Inline runtime access protection.
- Universal MFA for legacy, custom, command-line, or OT access.
- Authentication Firewall controls across hybrid infrastructure.
These criteria reflect public documentation, not independent testing.
Pricing
Silverfort publishes Core, Plus, Advanced, and Enterprise packages. It says pricing depends on organization size, but does not publish numeric list prices. Buyers must request a personalized quote.
No numeric 8Layers pricing was found on the reviewed public pages.
Methodology and limitations
We reviewed current first-party platform, product, compliance, and pricing pages on 13 August 2026. We did not test deployment, response coverage, or performance.
Confirm module availability, integration-specific actions, and final pricing with each vendor.
Star ratings and review counts are not included because this review did not verify a consistent, current third-party dataset for both vendors.
Sources reviewed
8Layers sources
FAQs
The reviewed 8Layers pages document response and containment actions. They do not establish Silverfort-style inline authentication enforcement.
Yes. Both vendors label ITDR and ISPM capabilities. Their detection methods, deployment architecture, and response coverage should be tested.
Silverfort publishes four package levels and a size-based pricing model, but not numeric list prices.